Skip to main content

Table 3 Efficacy and safety results from prospective clinical trials of TKIs in the 3L

From: Third-line therapy for chronic myeloid leukemia: current status and future directions

Trial

Efficacy

Safety

A phase I/II trial of 3L + bosutinib in patients with CML-CP resistant/intolerant to imatinib + dasatinib and/or nilotinib

  (Study 200) [18]

At 4 years:

 74% cumulative cCHR

  63% probability of maintaining cCHR

 40% cumulative MCyR

  69% probability of maintaining MCyR

 24% cumulative incidence of on-treatment CML-AP/BC or death and 22% on-study deaths

 78% KM-estimated OS

TEAEs reported in 100% of patients and grade 3/4 TEAEs reported in 68.1% of patients

Most common TEAEs were diarrhea (83%), nausea (48%), vomiting (38%), and thrombocytopenia (39%)

Ponatinib efficacy and safety in Ph + leukemia [19, 46]

Overall, in patients with CML-CP [19]:

 60% achieved MCyR at any time, of whom 54% achieved CCyR

 40% achieved MMR

 24% achieved MR4.5

 3% of patients transformed to CML-AP/BC

 KM-estimated PFS and OS at 5 years was 53% and 73%, respectively

In a study of patients with CML-CP and resistance/intolerance to nilotinib or dasatinib or who had a T315I mutation [46]:

 51% of patients with intolerance/resistance and 70% with T315I mutation achieved MCyR, with 40% and 66% achieving CCyR, respectively

 MMR was achieved in 27% of patients with resistance/intolerance to nilotinib or dasatinib and 56% of patients with a T315I mutation

 12% of patients discontinue use due to AEs

In patients with CML-CP [19]:

 Most common TEAEs

 (≥ 40%) were rash (47%), abdominal pain (46%), thrombocytopenia (46%), headache (43%), dry skin (42%), and constipation (41%)

 Most common grade 3/4 TEAEs (≥ 10%) were thrombocytopenia (35%), neutropenia (17%), hypertension (14%), increased lipase (13%), abdominal pain (10%), and anemia (10%)

 31% of patients had AOEs

In a study of patients with CML-CP and resistance/intolerance to nilotinib or dasatinib or who had a T315I mutation [46]:

 Common AEs were thrombocytopenia (37%), rash (34%), dry skin (32%), and abdominal pain (22%)

 Serious arterial thrombotic events occurred in 9% of patients, with 3% considered to be treatment related

 12% of patients discontinued use because of AEs

  1. 3L third line, AE adverse event, AOE arterio-occlusive event, cCHR cumulative confirmed complete hematologic response, CCyR complete cytogenetic response, CML-AP chronic myeloid leukemia in acute phase, CML-BC chronic myeloid leukemia in blast crisis, CML-CP chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase, KM Kaplan–Meier, MCyR major cytogenetic response, MMR major molecular response, MR4.5 4.5-log molecular response (BCR-ABL1IS ≤ 0.0032%), OS overall survival, Ph+ Philadelphia chromosome positive, PFS progression-free survival, TEAE treatment-emergent adverse event, TKI tyrosine kinase inhibitor