- Case report
- Open Access
Ring chromosome 18 abnormality in acute myelogenous leukemia: the clinical dilemma
© Sivendran et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2010
- Received: 7 June 2010
- Accepted: 22 July 2010
- Published: 22 July 2010
The ring chromosome is a circular, structural abnormality composed of either multiple chromosomes or a single chromosome with loss of genetic material at one or both ends. This chromosomal rearrangement is often unstable with frequent recombinations and may be accompanied by either loss or amplification of genetic material. Considering that ring chromosomes are rare in acute myelogenous leukemia (AML), it is difficult to risk stratify patient prognosis, particularly when the ring chromosome occurs as the sole abnormality. Here we report a case of a ring chromosome 18 abnormality in a patient with newly diagnosed AML with monocytic differentiation. Cytogenetic analysis demonstrated 46, XY, r(18)(p11q21) karyotype in 19 of 34 evaluated metaphase cells. The patient received induction chemotherapy and subsequent allogeneic cord blood transplant from a sex-matched donor, and remained in hematologic and cytogenetic remission for 120 days post transplant. Soon after, he developed post transplant lymphoproliferative disorder and died of multi-organ failure. Although r(18) chromosomal abnormalities were not classified in the recent updated evidence-and expert opinion-based recommendations for the diagnosis and management of AML (likely due to the small number of reported cases), the patient was treated as high risk with stem cell transplantation. This was based on the unstable nature of the ring chromosome and the poor outcomes described in the literature of patients with sole ring 18 abnormalities.
- Acute Myelogenous Leukemia
- Cytogenetic Abnormality
- Ring Chromosome
- Monocytic Differentiation
- Acute Monocytic Leukemia
Prognostic features in AML are strongly influenced by genetic changes in leukemic cells. Currently, based on cytogenetic findings and mutational status of some genes, patients are stratified into favorable, intermediate, and unfavorable risk categories. These categories are key determinants for attainment of complete remission and overall survival. Recent updated evidence-and expert opinion-based recommendations for the diagnosis and management of AML have provided further categorizations of AML based on pretreatment chromosomal abnormalities. However, there are rare, recurrent, cytogenetic abnormalities in AML that have not been classified. This is primarily due to the small number of reported patients, whose risk category and response to treatment is not well known. Ring chromosomes are rare cytogenetic abnormalities that occur in less than 10% of hematopoietic malignancies but have been reported in up to 70% of mesenchymal tumors. They vary in size, shape, and number. Only two patients were reported with AML and a ring chromosome 18 abnormality[4, 5]. In this report we describe a patient with M5 AML with a ring 18 abnormality and discuss the etiology, clinical features, classification, and the clinical dilemma related to treatment of ring chromosome aberrations in AML.
A 36 year old man presented with a one month history of nausea, loss of appetite, diarrhea, night sweats, and a twelve pound weight loss. He had no significant past medical history and, despite his work in construction, denied any previous chemical or radiation exposure. Peripheral blood revealed anemia (Hb 8.2 g/dL), thrombocytopenia (38 × 103/uL) and a white cell count of 2.6 × 103/uL. A bone marrow biopsy demonstrated a markedly hypercellular marrow (90-100% cellularity) with increased mature and immature granulocytes and atypical megakaryoctyes. The bone marrow aspirate contained myeloblasts, monoblasts, and promonocytes accounting for 36% of the cellularity. Significant dysplasia was present in the myeloid and erythroid lineages. Flow cytometry demonstrated an abnormal monocytic population characterized by HLA-DR+, CD13 partial+, CD64+, CD4dim+, and negative for CD14, suggestive of immaturity and reported to be a feature of abnormal monocytes in AML. Most CD 117 + myeloblasts and/or monoblasts were negative for CD34, another marker of immature cells which is usually negative in AML with monocytic differentiation. The diagnosis was consistent with acute monocytic leukemia.
The patient received induction chemotherapy on CALGB protocol 10503 with cytarabine arabinoside 100 mg/m2/day, daunorubicin 90 mg/m2/day, and etoposide 100 mg/m2/day. A repeat bone marrow aspirate and biopsy was consistent with a hypocellular marrow with no evidence of disease. Four cytogenetic analyses following induction chemotherapy demonstrated a normal 46, XY karyotype. The patient underwent a conditioning regimen of melphalan, thiotepa, fludarabine, and ATG followed by an allogeneic cord blood transplant from a sex matched donor. He remained in hematologic and cytogenetic remission with 100% donor cell engraftment for 120 days. Soon afterwards he developed post transplant lymphoproliferative disorder and died of multi-organ failure.
In patients with hematopoietic malignancies, ring chromosomes are commonly part of a complex karyotype. Only two patients with AML and an isolated ring 18 abnormality have been reported in the literature. The first case, a 47 year old male patient with AML-M4, had cytogenetic analysis performed on bone marrow cells after induction chemotherapy with 46, XY, r(18)(p11q23) karyotype and 9% of these cells contained a r(18). Breakpoints were not documented. This patient had greater than eighteen months of survival following diagnosis. The second patient had extensive chemotherapy and radiation for Hodgkin lymphoma and developed therapy related AML with 46, XX, r(18)(p11q21) karyotype. His response to chemotherapy was poor. It is important to note that both of these cases are over 20 years old and there is lack of documentation on these patients since the original reports. Additionally, given the advancements in cytogenetic analyses since these original reports, there was a chance for chromosome misidentification at the time.
Ring chromosomes occur when the two ends of a chromosome fuse together and form a ring shape. There are several ways in which this can occur. Breaks in the chromosome arms and fusion of the proximal broken ends can lead to ring formation with loss of distal chromosomal material. The cause of these DNA breaks and ligation of the ends is unknown. Alternatively, rings can be formed by telomere dysfunction. This occurs when the terminal ends of a chromosome fuse without significant loss of genetic material. Animal models and in vitro studies have shown that the mechanism of telomeric ring formation may be secondary to detachment of protective proteins on the chromosome ends when shortening of telomeric DNA occurs. The above two scenarios produce rings that do not necessarily produce amplified sequences. Rings that produce amplified sequences can also occur. This happens through the "break-fusion-bridge" which leads to frequent recombination events.
Literature review of ring 18 cases in acute myelogenous leukemia
Karyotype [Number of cells]
45, XY, der(1)t(1;11)(p36;q23), -11, dmin(18)46, XY, r(18), dmin(1) [NA]/46, WY, dmin(1)
Michalova et al
46, XX, r18(p11q21) [NA]/46, XX
Lee et al
46, XY, r(18)(p11q23)[9%]
Testa et al
43-46, XX, -3, -5, -7, +8, r(18), +20, dmin[cp19]/46, XX
Sawyer et al
r(18) and r(20) present. Full karyotype not available
Gisselsson et al
47, +21, r(?18)
AML-either M1 or M2
Fitzgerald et al
39-44, Y, der(X)t(X;9) (p11.2;?q32), del(1)(p13p32), t(1;10)(p21;q26), der(5)t(X;5)(p11.2;q11), -9, der(?16)r(16;
18)(?;?q11?q12), der(17)t(9;17)(?;p11), -18[cp3]
Mrozek et al
44, XX, del(2p), del(5q), - 7, - 9, - 14, der(l7]<i(l7p)?>, -18, r(18), - 21, + 22, + mar.variations 
Ring 18 present but karyotype not available so unclear if this is a sole abnormality
Schoch et al
45, XX, -7. r(18)
Lost to followup
Gibbons et al
Our patient had ring 18 as a sole abnormality without the loss of SYT, MALT1 and BCL2 by metaphase FISH. This is important because MALT1 and BCL2 are genes that regulate cell proliferation. To our knowledge, this case is the first ring 18 abnormality demonstrating that key genes were not lost during the ring formation. Although it is not possible to risk stratify this patient based on current guidelines, the patient was treated as high risk with stem cell transplantation. This decision is based on the unstable nature of the ring chromosome, previous trials conducted by the Medical Research Council, and the poor outcomes described in the literature of patients with sole ring 18 abnormalities. This case contributes to a growing body of literature to help risk stratify patients and guide treatment options in patients with ring abnormalities and acute myelogenous leukemia.
Written informed consent was obtained from the patient's next of kin for publication of this case report and any accompanying images. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the Editor-in-Chief of this journal.
- Gebhart E: Ring chromosomes in human neoplasias. Cytogenet Genome Res. 2008, 121 (3-4): 149-73. 10.1159/000138881.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mrozek K, Bloomfield CD: Chromosome aberrations, gene mutations and expression changes, and prognosis in adult acute myeloid leukemia. Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program. 2006, 169-77.Google Scholar
- Dohner H: Diagnosis and management of acute myeloid leukemia in adults: recommendations from an international expert panel, on behalf of the European LeukemiaNet. Blood. 2010, 115 (3): 453-74. 10.1182/blood-2009-07-235358.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lee EJ: Minimally differentiated acute nonlymphocytic leukemia: a distinct entity. Blood. 1987, 70 (5): 1400-6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Testa JR: Chromosomal alterations in acute leukemia patients studied with improved culture methods. Cancer Res. 1985, 45 (1): 430-4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kaleem Z: Flow cytometric analysis of acute leukemias. Diagnostic utility and critical analysis of data. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2003, 127 (1): 42-8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Byrd JC: Pretreatment cytogenetic abnormalities are predictive of induction success, cumulative incidence of relapse, and overall survival in adult patients with de novo acute myeloid leukemia: results from Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB 8461). Blood. 2002, 100 (13): 4325-36. 10.1182/blood-2002-03-0772.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Slovak ML: Karyotypic analysis predicts outcome of preremission and postremission therapy in adult acute myeloid leukemia: a Southwest Oncology Group/Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Study. Blood. 2000, 96 (13): 4075-83.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Grimwade D: The importance of diagnostic cytogenetics on outcome in AML: analysis of 1,612 patients entered into the MRC AML 10 trial. The Medical Research Council Adult and Children's Leukaemia Working Parties. Blood. 1998, 92 (7): 2322-33.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Michalova K: Double minute chromosomes in a patient with myelodysplastic syndrome transforming into acute myeloid leukemia. Cancer Genet Cytogenet. 1999, 109 (1): 76-8. 10.1016/S0165-4608(98)00133-2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sawyer JR: Cytogenetic findings in 200 patients with multiple myeloma. Cancer Genet Cytogenet. 1995, 82 (1): 41-9. 10.1016/0165-4608(94)00284-I.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gisselsson D: The structure and dynamics of ring chromosomes in human neoplastic and non-neoplastic cells. Hum Genet. 1999, 104 (4): 315-25. 10.1007/s004390050960.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Fitzgerald PH: Nonrandom cytogenetic changes in New Zealand patients with acute myeloid leukemia. Cancer Genet Cytogenet. 1983, 8 (1): 51-66. 10.1016/0165-4608(83)90064-X.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mrozek K: Spectral karyotyping in patients with acute myeloid leukemia and a complex karyotype shows hidden aberrations, including recurrent overrepresentation of 21q, 11q, and 22q. Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 2002, 34 (2): 137-53. 10.1002/gcc.10027.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Cytogenetics of acutely transformed chronic myeloproliferative syndromes without a Philadelphia chromosome. A multicenter study of 55 patients. Groupe Francais de Cytogenetique Hematologique. Cancer Genet Cytogenet. 1988, 32 (2): 157-68. 10.1016/0165-4608(88)90278-6.Google Scholar
- Schoch C: Loss of genetic material is more common than gain in acute myeloid leukemia with complex aberrant karyotype: a detailed analysis of 125 cases using conventional chromosome analysis and fluorescence in situ hybridization including 24-color FISH. Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 2002, 35 (1): 20-9. 10.1002/gcc.10088.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gibbons B: Fluorescence in situ hybridisation studies to characterise complete and partial monosomy 7 in myeloid disorders. Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 1994, 10 (4): 244-9. 10.1002/gcc.2870100404.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.